<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.winsec.be/utility/FeedStylesheets/atom.xsl" media="screen"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en"><title type="html">Kim Cameron&amp;#39;s Identity Weblog</title><subtitle type="html" /><id>http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/atom.aspx</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/default.aspx" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/atom.aspx" /><generator uri="http://communityserver.org" version="4.0.31104.93">Community Server</generator><updated>2011-04-06T17:16:14Z</updated><entry><title>Disintermediation:  an Amazon parable</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/10/17/disintermediation-an-amazon-parable.aspx" /><id>/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/10/17/disintermediation-an-amazon-parable.aspx</id><published>2011-10-17T21:27:23Z</published><updated>2011-10-17T21:27:23Z</updated><content type="html">A spine tingling story with a sequel about reusable identities Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/10/17/disintermediation-an-amazon-parable.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.winsec.be/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1816" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.winsec.be/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="U-Prove" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/U-Prove/default.aspx" /><category term="Minimal Disclosure" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Minimal+Disclosure/default.aspx" /><category term="Digital Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Identity/default.aspx" /><category term="Federation" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Federation/default.aspx" /><category term="Business Model" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Business+Model/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>A social network or the name police – but not both</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/10/16/a-social-network-or-the-name-police-but-not-both.aspx" /><id>/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/10/16/a-social-network-or-the-name-police-but-not-both.aspx</id><published>2011-10-16T14:48:12Z</published><updated>2011-10-16T14:48:12Z</updated><content type="html">According to Bob Blakely, &amp;quot;Google wants to be in the “social” business. But they’re not behaving sociably.&amp;quot; Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/10/16/a-social-network-or-the-name-police-but-not-both.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.winsec.be/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1815" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.winsec.be/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Digital Rights" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Rights/default.aspx" /><category term="Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Identity/default.aspx" /><category term="User control" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/User+control/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>24 year old student lights match:  Europe versus Facebook</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/10/13/24-year-old-student-lights-match-europe-versus-facebook.aspx" /><id>/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/10/13/24-year-old-student-lights-match-europe-versus-facebook.aspx</id><published>2011-10-13T14:43:01Z</published><updated>2011-10-13T14:43:01Z</updated><content type="html">Facebook generation&amp;#39;s Max Schrems is walloping Facebook with a media-savvy rejection of some fundamental assumptions Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/10/13/24-year-old-student-lights-match-europe-versus-facebook.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.winsec.be/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1814" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.winsec.be/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Privacy" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Privacy/default.aspx" /><category term="Linkage" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Linkage/default.aspx" /><category term="Intellectual Property" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Intellectual+Property/default.aspx" /><category term="Blog" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Blog/default.aspx" /><category term="Digital Rights" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Rights/default.aspx" /><category term="Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Identity/default.aspx" /><category term="Digital Eternity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Eternity/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Arrogant bullies versus Superheroine</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/08/12/arrogant-bullies-versus-superheroine.aspx" /><id>/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/08/12/arrogant-bullies-versus-superheroine.aspx</id><published>2011-08-12T03:21:17Z</published><updated>2011-08-12T03:21:17Z</updated><content type="html">&amp;quot;Give up your identity, Identity Woman!&amp;quot; Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/08/12/arrogant-bullies-versus-superheroine.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.winsec.be/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1763" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.winsec.be/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Identity/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Linked In loses it</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/08/12/linked-in-loses-it.aspx" /><id>/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/08/12/linked-in-loses-it.aspx</id><published>2011-08-12T01:57:31Z</published><updated>2011-08-12T01:57:31Z</updated><content type="html">We need a professional network that respects the rights of the people in it. Linked In just lost my vote. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/08/12/linked-in-loses-it.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.winsec.be/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1762" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.winsec.be/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Digital Rights" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Rights/default.aspx" /><category term="Ethics" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Identity/default.aspx" /><category term="User control" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/User+control/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Who is harmed by a “Real Names” policy?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/07/23/who-is-harmed-by-a-real-names-policy.aspx" /><id>/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/07/23/who-is-harmed-by-a-real-names-policy.aspx</id><published>2011-07-23T00:44:39Z</published><updated>2011-07-23T00:44:39Z</updated><content type="html">Those of us working on identity technology have to internalize the lessons here Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/07/23/who-is-harmed-by-a-real-names-policy.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.winsec.be/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1740" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.winsec.be/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Privacy" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Privacy/default.aspx" /><category term="Minimal Disclosure" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Minimal+Disclosure/default.aspx" /><category term="Attacks" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Attacks/default.aspx" /><category term="Digital Rights" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Rights/default.aspx" /><category term="Ethics" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="anonymity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/anonymity/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Head over to the Office of Indadequate Security</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/07/22/head-over-to-the-office-of-indadequate-security.aspx" /><id>/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/07/22/head-over-to-the-office-of-indadequate-security.aspx</id><published>2011-07-22T07:57:30Z</published><updated>2011-07-22T07:57:30Z</updated><content type="html">It even has a twitter feed for breach junkies Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/07/22/head-over-to-the-office-of-indadequate-security.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.winsec.be/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1739" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.winsec.be/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Privacy" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Privacy/default.aspx" /><category term="Blog" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Blog/default.aspx" /><category term="Attacks" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Attacks/default.aspx" /><category term="hacking" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/hacking/default.aspx" /><category term="Information loss" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Information+loss/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Idiot’s Guide to Why Voicemail Hacking is a Crime</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/07/22/the-idiot-s-guide-to-why-voicemail-hacking-is-a-crime.aspx" /><id>/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/07/22/the-idiot-s-guide-to-why-voicemail-hacking-is-a-crime.aspx</id><published>2011-07-22T07:13:33Z</published><updated>2011-07-22T07:13:33Z</updated><content type="html">Defense lawyers have argued that voicemail has already been transmitted and is therefore no longer &amp;quot;in the course of its transmission.&amp;quot; Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/07/22/the-idiot-s-guide-to-why-voicemail-hacking-is-a-crime.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.winsec.be/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1738" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.winsec.be/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Privacy" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Privacy/default.aspx" /><category term="Believe it or not" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Believe+it+or+not/default.aspx" /><category term="hacking" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/hacking/default.aspx" /><category term="Ethics" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Identity/default.aspx" /><category term="Law" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Law/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Robots reshaping social networks</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/07/02/robots-reshaping-social-networks.aspx" /><id>/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/07/02/robots-reshaping-social-networks.aspx</id><published>2011-07-02T14:24:03Z</published><updated>2011-07-02T14:24:03Z</updated><content type="html">Twitter SocialBots were &amp;quot;increasingly able to carve out their own independent community — as seen in the clustering of targets away from the established tightly-knit networks and towards the bots themselves.&amp;quot; Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/07/02/robots-reshaping-social-networks.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.winsec.be/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1722" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.winsec.be/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="U-Prove" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/U-Prove/default.aspx" /><category term="Research" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx" /><category term="Digital Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Identity/default.aspx" /><category term="Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Identity/default.aspx" /><category term="Code" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Code/default.aspx" /><category term="Social Engineering" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Social+Engineering/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>New paper on Wi-Fi positioning systems</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/06/28/new-paper-on-wi-fi-positioning-systems.aspx" /><id>/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/06/28/new-paper-on-wi-fi-positioning-systems.aspx</id><published>2011-06-28T11:03:16Z</published><updated>2011-06-28T11:03:16Z</updated><content type="html">In a new paper Ann Cavoukian and I argue that when reusing an existing architecture for unintended purposes, we must beware of unintended consequences Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/06/28/new-paper-on-wi-fi-positioning-systems.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.winsec.be/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1714" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.winsec.be/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Linkage" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Linkage/default.aspx" /><category term="Digital Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Identity/default.aspx" /><category term="Laws of Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Laws+of+Identity/default.aspx" /><category term="Wifi" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Wifi/default.aspx" /><category term="Location" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Location/default.aspx" /><category term="Privacy By Design" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Privacy+By+Design/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Change of status</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/06/27/change-of-status.aspx" /><id>/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/06/27/change-of-status.aspx</id><published>2011-06-27T19:02:39Z</published><updated>2011-06-27T19:02:39Z</updated><content type="html">I will keep my hand in the identity and social computing space to the extent that people find my input useful. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/06/27/change-of-status.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.winsec.be/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1711" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.winsec.be/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Blog" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Blog/default.aspx" /><category term="Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Identity/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Google opposing the “Right to be forgotten”</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/04/21/google-opposing-the-right-to-be-forgotten.aspx" /><id>/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/04/21/google-opposing-the-right-to-be-forgotten.aspx</id><published>2011-04-21T20:12:59Z</published><updated>2011-04-21T20:12:59Z</updated><content type="html">&amp;quot;This is just the beginning, this right to be forgotten, but it&amp;#39;s going to be much more important in the future,&amp;quot; said Artemi Rallo, director of the Spanish Data Protection Agency. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/04/21/google-opposing-the-right-to-be-forgotten.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.winsec.be/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1639" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.winsec.be/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Linkage" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Linkage/default.aspx" /><category term="Digital Rights" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Rights/default.aspx" /><category term="Digital Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Identity/default.aspx" /><category term="Ethics" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="Digital Eternity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Eternity/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Privacy Bill of Rights establishes device identifiers as PII</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/04/13/privacy-bill-of-rights-establishes-device-identifiers-as-pii.aspx" /><id>/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/04/13/privacy-bill-of-rights-establishes-device-identifiers-as-pii.aspx</id><published>2011-04-13T15:10:08Z</published><updated>2011-04-13T15:10:08Z</updated><content type="html">But despite real positives, the bill as currently formulated leaves me eager to consult a bevy of lawyers... Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/04/13/privacy-bill-of-rights-establishes-device-identifiers-as-pii.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.winsec.be/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1626" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.winsec.be/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Privacy" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Privacy/default.aspx" /><category term="Minimal Disclosure" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Minimal+Disclosure/default.aspx" /><category term="Digital Rights" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Rights/default.aspx" /><category term="Digital Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Identity/default.aspx" /><category term="Laws of Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Laws+of+Identity/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Kerry McCain bill proposes “minimal disclosure for specific purpose”</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/04/12/kerry-mccain-bill-proposes-minimal-disclosure-for-specific-purpose.aspx" /><id>/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/04/12/kerry-mccain-bill-proposes-minimal-disclosure-for-specific-purpose.aspx</id><published>2011-04-11T23:56:21Z</published><updated>2011-04-11T23:56:21Z</updated><content type="html">Seminal advance: definition of &amp;quot;covered information&amp;quot; specifically includes device IDs. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/04/12/kerry-mccain-bill-proposes-minimal-disclosure-for-specific-purpose.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.winsec.be/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1620" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.winsec.be/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Privacy" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Privacy/default.aspx" /><category term="Minimal Disclosure" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Minimal+Disclosure/default.aspx" /><category term="Claims" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Claims/default.aspx" /><category term="Digital Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Identity/default.aspx" /><category term="Information loss" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Information+loss/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>WSJ:  Federal Prosecutors investigate smartphone apps</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/04/06/wsj-federal-prosecutors-investigate-smartphone-apps.aspx" /><id>/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/04/06/wsj-federal-prosecutors-investigate-smartphone-apps.aspx</id><published>2011-04-06T15:16:14Z</published><updated>2011-04-06T15:16:14Z</updated><content type="html">The probe is significant because it involves potentially criminal charges that could be applicable to numerous companies Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/2011/04/06/wsj-federal-prosecutors-investigate-smartphone-apps.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.winsec.be/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1615" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://www.winsec.be/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Privacy" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Privacy/default.aspx" /><category term="Digital Rights" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Rights/default.aspx" /><category term="Digital Identity" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Digital+Identity/default.aspx" /><category term="Ethics" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="Location" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Location/default.aspx" /><category term="Fraud" scheme="http://www.winsec.be/blogs/kimcameron/archive/tags/Fraud/default.aspx" /></entry></feed>
